Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
| Deckers Outdoor Corporation |
| Does, Sears Brands, LLC., Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co. |
| 2:2014cv02561 |
| April 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Court ORDERSthe parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by September 10, 2015, why settlementhas not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL 45 . The Court further orders that all discovery matters will now be referred to Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 12/16/2014. (lc).
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AS TO ALL CASES 35 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER SETTING UNIFIED SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On July 3, 2014, the Court consolidated the Deckers Cases, finding that they are related within the meaning of General Order 08-05, section 5, and Local Rule 83-1.3. (ECF No. 29 .) In order to efficiently manage these related cases, the Court SETS a unified scheduling conference in all actions for Monday, September 22, 2014 at 1:30 pm the same date currently set for a scheduling conference in 2:14-cv-02577. The Court accordi ngly CONTINUES the scheduling conferences already set in 2:14-cv- 02561 and 2:14-cv-02649 to that date. The Court understands that Defendant J.C. Penney Company Inc. has not yet answered the recently filed First Amended Complaint in 2:14-cv-02565. J. C. Penney Company is therefore not required to attend the scheduling conference or participate in Rule 26(f) discussions unless it answers the First Amended Complaint before the unified scheduling conference. In anticipation of the unified scheduling conference, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff and all parties who have answered in the Deckers Cases to participate in joint Rule 26(f) discussions, preferably in person. The parties shall submit a Rule 26(f)report just like any other scheduling conference and file it in the master case file. The parties shall file the joint report no later than seven days before the scheduling conference. (lc). Modified on 7/9/2014 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: List of Deckers Cases:2:14-cv-02561-ODW(CWx); 2:14-cv-02565-ODW(MANx); 2:14-cv-02577-ODW(CWx); 2:14-cv-02649-ODW(PLAx). The low-number case, Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Sears Holdings Corp. et al., No. 2:14-cv-02561-ODW(CWx) (C.D. Cal. case filed Apr. 4, 2014), will serve as the master case file.This Order does not constitute a determination that these actions should be consolidated for trial, nor does it have the effect of making any entity a party to an action in which it has not been joined and served in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All orders, pleadings, motions, and other documents will, when filed and docketed in the master case file, be deemed filed and doc keted in each individual related case to the extent applicable. Parties shall enter their appearances in the individual cases, and the Clerk is directed to add all parties and attorneys from the individual cases to the master case file such that all counsel appearing in the individual cases will receive notifications for the master case file as well. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS ) The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to immediately serve a copy of this order on all Defendants who have not yet filed appearances in the cases (and who therefore have not received a copy through the CM/ECF system). (lc). Modified on 7/7/2014. (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
