Myron Weintraub v. Pharmavite LLC

Myron Weintraub v. Pharmavite LLC

Plaintiff:	Myron Weintraub
Defendant:	Pharmavite LLC
Case Number:	2:2014cv03218
Filed:	April 25, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Frederick F. Mumm
Presiding Judge:	Beverly Reid O'Connell
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2015	Filing 73 ORDER ON STIPULATION OF PARTIES RE E-DISCOVERY PROTOCOL ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re Stipulation for Discovery 70 . The Court, upon all of the files, records, the parties' stipulation, the proceedings herein and for the rea sons stated on the record, now makes and enters the following Order establishing a protocol for the preservation and production of electronically stored information (ESI). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff and defendant in this Action must comply with the following obligations in this litigation: (See Order for details.) (mp)
June 3, 2014	Filing 20 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff must respond by June 16, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED (rfi)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2015

Filing 73 ORDER ON STIPULATION OF PARTIES RE E-DISCOVERY PROTOCOL ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re Stipulation for Discovery 70 . The Court, upon all of the files, records, the parties' stipulation, the proceedings herein and for the rea sons stated on the record, now makes and enters the following Order establishing a protocol for the preservation and production of electronically stored information (ESI). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff and defendant in this Action must comply with the following obligations in this litigation: (See Order for details.) (mp)

June 3, 2014

Filing 20 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff must respond by June 16, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED (rfi)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Myron Weintraub v. Pharmavite LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Pharmavite LLC
Represented By:	Bridget M Ahmann
Represented By:	Joseph M Price
Represented By:	Rene P Tatro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Myron Weintraub
Represented By:	Alison M Bernal
Represented By:	Jonathan D Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?