Gary Fisher v. Michael Planet
Petitioner: Gary Fisher
Respondent: Michael Planet
Case Number: 2:2014cv03356
Filed: April 30, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Presiding Judge: Margaret A. Nagle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RULE 58 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of respondent and against the petitioner. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF EXHAUSTION AND/OR UNTIMELINESS by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/7/2014. (ec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gary Fisher v. Michael Planet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Planet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gary Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?