Carlos L. Gallardo v. Tim V. Virga
Petitioner: Carlos L. Gallardo
Respondent: Tim V. Virga
Case Number: 2:2014cv03788
Filed: May 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A. Kronstadt
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 32 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp) (Main Document 33 replaced on 9/14/2016) (mp).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlos L. Gallardo v. Tim V. Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carlos L. Gallardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tim V. Virga
Represented By: Dana M Ali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?