Richard Greenberg v. Richard M. Johnson et al
| Richard Greenberg |
| Jennifer Fraser, Richard M. Johnson, Ovsep Khacheryan, John C. Nelson and Glenn Turner |
| 2:2014cv04605 |
| June 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: The Stipulation to Dismiss Case 89 is GRANTED, with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and fees. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cw)
|
|
Filing
82
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. On July 13, 2015, defendant Richard M. Johnston filed two motions to compel plaintiff to respond to written discovery . Defendant contends that plaintiff failed to provide any response to properly served interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Given the foregoing, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within 10 days of the date of this order, if any he has, why sanctions should not be imposed upon him for failure to comply with his discovery obligations pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court. Sanctions contemplated by this Court include monetary sanctions, issue sanctions, and/or dismissal for failure to prosecute. (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
