Eros Tours & Travel, Inc. et al v. Infinitywaves, LLC et al
| Airtkt.com, Inc., Eros Group USA, Inc. and Eros Tours & Travel, Inc. |
| Rajiv Bharadwaj, Does, Rohit Dubal, Infinitywaves, LLC, Rajan Jaisingh, Manu Panday, Ashish Rathour, Hanumant Rawat and Manav Suri |
| 2:2014cv05095 |
| July 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: Before the Court are two motions. The first is a Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint filed by plaintiffs Eros Tours & Travel, Inc., Eros Group USA, Inc., and AirTkt.com, Inc. 75 . Th e second is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Action for Forum Non Conveniens filed by defendants Infinitywaves, LLC and Ashish Rathour 78 . Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds these ma tters appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for April 6, 2015 is vacated, and the matters taken off calendar. The Court has tentatively concluded to deny the Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint and gra nt the Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens. It appears that India offers an adequate alternative forum provided Infinitywaves and Rathour consent to the jurisdiction of Indian Courts. Alternatively, Plaintiffs may elect to pursuethis action in this court against Infinitywaves and Rathour by dismissing without prejudice the claims against the foreign defendants who have yet to appear in this action. If Plaintiffs decide to pursue their claims against Infinitywaves and Rathour, they shall file a Notice of Dismissal as to the foreign defendants no later than April 10, 2015. See document for details. (smo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
