Gaye H. v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
| Gaye H. |
| Unum Life Insurance Company of America |
| 2:2014cv05331 |
| July 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. Pursuant to the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law issued on June 9, 2015 75 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Gaye Hertan ("Plaintiff") shall have Judgment in her favor and against defendant Unum Life Insurance Company ("Defendant") on her claim for partial long term disability benefits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant reinstate Plaintiff's partial long term disability benefits effective October 5, 2012.It is FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff shall have her costs of suit and that any Motion for Attorneys' Fees shall be filed in accordance with the Court's June 9, 2015 Minute Order 74 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
|
|
Filing
57
Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re NOTICE OF INTENT TO WITHDRAW DISCOVERY MOTION FOLLOWING SUCCESSFUL MEET AND CONFER PROCESS, 55 . ***NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT*** (mr)
|
|
Filing
13
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10. See Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D. 158 , 163 (N.D. Cal. 1981) ("This court has both the duty and the right to ensure compliance with the Federal Rules and to take action necessary to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases."). In the alternative, Plaintiff ma y file an Amended Complaint listing Plaintiff's full name. Plaintiff's response to this Order shall be filed by September 22, 2014. Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice or the imposition of sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gaye H. v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gaye H. | |
| Represented By: | Corinne Chandler |
| Represented By: | Alan E Kassan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unum Life Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W Maguire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
