Gucci America Inc v. Tango Collection Inc et al
| Gucci America Inc |
| Does, Tango Collection Inc and Khaled Tehfe |
| 2:2014cv06682 |
| August 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
STIPULATED CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 32 , ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants Tango Collection, Inc., a California corporation, and Khaled Tehfe a/k/a Henry, an individua l, individually and jointly, d/b/a Pavini Jeans d/b/a Pavini d/b/a Tango Collection, and their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and all persons in active concert and participation with them are hereby permanently restrained and en joined re Gucci Mark, etc. The parties' respective attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with this action shall be borne as per the agreement of the individual parties in their Settlement Agreement. All products bearing the Gucci Mark at issue currently in the possession, custody and/or control of the Defendants required to be surrendered to Gucci under the terms of the parties' settlement as well as all products surrendered by the Defendants during the Court authorized seizure, shall be destroyed at the direction of Gucci. See document for details. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
