Chad Thomas Richmond v. Connie Gibbson

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Chad Thomas Richmond v. Connie Gibbson

Chad Thomas Richmond v. Connie Gibbson

Petitioner:	Chad Thomas Richmond
Respondent:	Connie Gibbson
Case Number:	2:2014cv06812
Filed:	September 2, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Guilford
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 30, 2017	Filing 49 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 48 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)
September 15, 2014	Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On September 2, 2014, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears the one-year statute of limitatio ns has expired. The court, therefore, orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before October 15, 2014, why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 30, 2017

Filing 49 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 48 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

September 15, 2014

Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On September 2, 2014, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears the one-year statute of limitatio ns has expired. The court, therefore, orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before October 15, 2014, why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chad Thomas Richmond v. Connie Gibbson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Connie Gibbson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Chad Thomas Richmond
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?