Richard Dickson v. E. Valenzuela et al
| Richard Dickson |
| A. Arutyunyan and E. Valenzuela |
| 2:2014cv06954 |
| September 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O. Carter |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Defendants against Richard Dickson Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 54 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ec)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge David O. Carter for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 45 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Third Amended Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend, in part, and without leave to amend, in part, as set forth in the Report; (2) If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, he shall file and serve a Fourth Amended Complaint that corrects the defects identified in the Report by no later than 30 days from the filing date of this Order. The Fourt h Amended Complaint shall be complete in itself, must include all exhibits, and shall not incorporate any prior allegations or exhibits by reference; and (3) Defendants' time to response to the Fourth Amended Complaint is stayed pending further order of the Court, so that the required screening of the pleading may occur. (ec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
