Liu Aifang et al v. Velocity VIII Limited Partnership et al
| Liu Aifang, Xin Bin, Jin Bixia, Wang Hongmei, Xu Jing, Zhu Jingbo, Gao Jinliang, Gou Xiaoye, Su Yan and Tan Yanting |
| Does, Yunyan Guan, Ben Pang, REO Group Properties, LLC, REO Property Group, LLC, Velocity Regional Center LLC, Velocity VIII Limited Partnership, Yin Nan Wang and Frank Zeng |
| 2:2014cv07060 |
| September 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
299
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT Plaintiffs are awarded a monetary judgment against Defendants jointly and severally in the sum of $8,000,000. FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT, pursuant to Californi a Civil Code section 3287(a), Plaintiffs shall recover froM Defendants jointly and severally pre-judgment interest at a rate of seven percent per annum, which shall accrue from 10/9/2015 until thedate of entry of Final Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT, pursuant to 28 USC section 1961(a), the total amount of this judgment shall bear post-judgment interest at a rate of 0.60 percent from the date of entry of Final Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing
292
JUDGMENT IN CIVIL ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT YIN NAN WANG AKA MICHAEL WANG by Judge S. James Otero: Pursuant to the terms of the Stipulated Judgment 290 previously agreed to among Defendant Yin Nan Wang aka Michael Wang and Plaintiffs Liu Aif ang, Jin Bixia, Su Yan, Zhu Jingbo, Xu Jing, Gao Jinliang, Gou Xiaoye, Wang Hongmei, Xin Bin, Tan Yanting, Tao Qing, Lu Tsui-Hua, Chen Xiaoyan, Chen Jianxiu, Zhou Jun, and Xian Hao (Plaintiffs) and there being no just reason for delay: IT IS ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered against Defendant Yin Nan Wang, aka Michael Wang, and in favor of Plaintiffs, in the principal sum of Four Million Dollars (USD $4,000,000.00). (vv)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO FOUR DEFENDANTS by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiffs to show cause in writing no later than November 6, 2014, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as against the Defendants in Issue. See order for details. (hr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
