The People of the State of California et al v Kirell Francis Bettis
| State of California and The People of the State of California |
| Kirell Francis Bettis |
| 2:2014cv08271 |
| October 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge George H. King. The Court previously received from Kirell Francis Bettis a lodged "Notice of Removal." Wenote that although the filing was styled as a "Notice of Removal," Mr. Bettis is not, in fac t, removing an action filed in state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446, but rather is attempting to file a new federal action. Moreover, although Mr. Bettis represents that he is the Defendant in this action, it appears from the face of his f iling that he intends to prosecute this action against the State of California. Mr. Bettis's Notice of Removal was filed without an accompanying IFP request and without payment of the filing fees. On October 24, 2014, the Court sent a warning letter to Mr. Bettis advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number., Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
