Jay Greene v. K Mart Corporation et al
| Jay Greene |
| K Mart Corporation and Does |
| 2:2014cv08382 |
| October 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 15 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear his or its own respective fees and costs. All pending proceedings are vacated and no further proceedings shall take place in this action. (gk)
|
|
Filing
14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee 13 In light of the notice of settlement, filed December 5, 2014, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By December 22, 2014 the parties shall file either (1) a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment or (2) motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of December 23, 2014.This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. The scheduling conference on December 19, 2014 is VACATED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (im)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
