Linda Hawkins v. UGI Corporation et al
| Linda Hawkins |
| Amerigas Partners, L.P., Amerigas Propane, Inc., Amerigas Propane, L.P., Ferrellgas Company, Inc., Ferrellgas Finance Corp., Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp., Ferrellgas Partners, L. P., Ferrellgas, Inc., Ferrellgas, L.P. and UGI Corporation |
| 2:2014cv08461 |
| October 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Contract Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants UGI CORPORATION, AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC., AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P., AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P., dba AMERIGAS CYLINDER EXCHANGE, FERRELLGAS COMPANY, INC., FERRELLGAS , L.P., dba BLUE RHINO, FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P., FERRELLGAS, INC., FERRELLGAS PARTNERS FINANCE CORP., and FERRELLGAS FINANCE CORP. as follows: Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs Linda Hawkins and Temi Treibatch.Plaintiffs shall take nothing as to Defendants by way of their Second Amended Complaint [Dkt. 55]. (lc)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 61 , 62 . The Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 41 , 42 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Because Plaintiffs have not plausibly alleged that Defendants' representations were inaccurate or misleading, the CAC must be dismissed. Any amended complaint shall be filed within fourteen days of the date of this Order. (lom)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiff's largely unopposed Motion to Consolidate the Hawkins Action, No. 14-cv-8461-DDP (Jcx) 14 , 15 and the Treibach Action,No. 14-cv-09398 DDP )JCx, is GRANTED, in part and DENIED in part.Plaintiffs sh all file an Amended (Consolidated) Complaint in the Hawkins Action within ten days of the date of this Order. Upon filing of the Amended (Consolidated) Complaint, the court shall dismiss the Treibach Action. Defendants shall file responses to the Ame nded (Consolidated) Complaint by May 11, 2015. If the responses are in the form of motions, Plaintiffs' opposition shall be filed by June 1, 2015. Any reply shall be filed by June 15, 2015. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss shall be noticed fo r hearing on June 29, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. The pending motions 22 and 23 are VACATED. Plaintiff's motion is denied insofar as it seeks to establish a leadership structure at this stage. Upon filing of the Consolidated Complaint, the parties may file a stipulation regarding, or Plaintiff may seek relief from, Local Rule 23-3. (lc). Modified on 4/23/2015 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
