Jeremy Leon Bordegaray v. County of Santa Barbara et al
| Jeremy Leon Bordegaray |
| Sheriff Bill Brown, Sheriif Bill Brown, Sgt Daniel Calderon, City of Carpenteria, County of Santa Barbara, Does, Deputy Sean Hampton, Deputy Wesley Johnson and Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office |
| 2:2014cv08610 |
| November 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL [F.R.C.P. 41] by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: Pursuant to Stipulation of the Parties by and through their respective counsel 135 , the action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice against all defendants pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party to bear their own costs and fees. (gk)
|
|
Filing
113
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief Re: Civil Code Section 3333.3 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 12/12/2016, the Court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion for summary judgment 109 . However, the Court reserved ruling at that time on the issue of whether Section 3333.3 bars plaintiff's claim for negligence against defendants. Plaintiff filed a supplemental brief addressing Section 3333.3 on 12/20/2016 112 . The Court now addresses whether de fendants are entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's negligence claim on the basis of Section 3333.3. The Court GRANTS defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim of negligence 45 . Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
111
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS IN LIMINE NO. 1 THROUGH 7 (Dkts. 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 filed October 24, 2016) DEFENDANTS MOTIONS IN LIMINE NO. 1 THROUGH 7 (Dkts. 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , filed on October 24, 2016) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: In accordance with the foregoing: The Court GRANTS plaintiffs motions in limine No. 1 and 6 in part and DENIES them in part; The Court GRANTS plaintiffs motions in limine Nos. 2 and 4; The Court DENIES plaintiffs motions in limine No. 3, 5, and 7; The Court GRANTS defendants motion in limine No. 1. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants motions in limine Nos. 2, 4, 6, and 7; The Court DENIES defendants motions in limine Nos. 3 and 5. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
|
Filing
109
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Defendants' Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Amend Answer 44 ; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 45 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court: (1) GRANTS defendants' motion to modify the scheduling o rder and amend their answer; the Court GRANTS plaintiff ten days to file a supplemental opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment, based only on the new affirmative defense. (2) DENIES defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's excessive force claim. (3) GRANTS defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim for failure to provide medical care in the field. (4) GRANTS defendants' motion for summary judgment with respect to plaint iff's Monell liability claim against Sheriff Brown in his official capacity. (5) DENIES defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's Monell claim to the extent plaintiff bases his Monell claim on an underlying violation of pl aintiff's rights. (6) DENIES defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's Monell claim to the extent that plaintiff bases his Monell claim on failure to train. (7) GRANTS defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaint iff's Monell claim to the extent that plaintiff bases his Monell claim on ratification. (8) GRANTS defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's Monell claim to the extent that plaintiff bases his Monell claim on and customs o f excessive force, failure to provide medical care in the field, and covering up misconduct. (9) DENIES defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's Monell claim to the extent that plaintiff bases his Monell claim on inadequate su pervision, enabling constitutional violations, failure to discipline, deficient hiring, facilitating a code of silence, encouraging officers to believe they can violate persons' rights, and failure to ensure that officers made truthful reports. (10) GRANTS defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's supervisory liability claim against Calderon. (11) DENIES defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's supervisory liability claim against Brown. (12) DENIES defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's battery claim. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
