Gerardo Salcido v. Evolution Fresh, Inc.
Gerardo Salcido |
Does and Evolution Fresh, Inc. |
2:2014cv09223 |
December 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L. Abrams |
Stephen V. Wilson |
Labor: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Having reviewed the parties' stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court orders as follows: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)( 1 )(A)(ii), the above captioned a ction is hereby voluntarily dismissed as follows: (1) Plaintiff's individual claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and (2) all putative class claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each side to bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cr) |
Filing 55 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 14 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Comt finds that Evolution has adequately proven the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million. The Court therefore DENIES Salcido's motion to remand. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom) |
Filing 27 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 26 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. *Note Changes Made by the Court** (es) |
Filing 24 MINUTES Of New Case Status Conference and Motion Hearing held before Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case 14 and Motion to Strike 16 are submitted. Order to issue. Court Reporter: Deborah Gackle. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.