Standard Fabrics International Inc v. Charlotte Russe Inc et al
Standard Fabrics International Inc |
Charlotte Russe Holding Inc, Charlotte Russe Inc, Charlotte Russe Merchandising Inc and Does |
2:2014cv09563 |
December 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Margaret A. Nagle |
John F. Walter |
Copyright |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter: In the Notice of Settlement filed on September 25, 2015, Dkt. No. 27 , the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice subject to ei ther party reopening the action on or before October 26, 2015. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until October 26, 2015. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cw) |
Filing 26 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The Court Orders that the terms of the parties Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order Regarding Non-Disclosure of Confidential Information shall govern the handling of such documents produced or disclosed by the parties in this case. 25 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (gr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.