The People of the State of California v. Bank of America Corporation et al
The People of the State of California |
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Countrywide Bank, FSB, Countrywide Financial Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans |
2:2014cv09744 |
December 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Alicia G. Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that in the alternative, and to the ex tent plaintiff could be considered to have asserted a federal claim, this action is nevertheless dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff engaged in impermissible claim-splitting. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff take nothing and that defendants shall have their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
Filing 13 IN CHAMBERS- COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The City and Feuer shall respond to this order to show cause no later than January 16, 2015. BofA's response, if any, shall be filed no later than January 23, 2015. After January 23, 2015, the matter shall be deemed under submission. The Court will notify the parties once it has issued a decision. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.