U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Stacia Trimmer et al
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant: Doe Occupants, Darryl Jones, Mary Jones and Stacia Trimmer
Case Number: 2:2014cv09766
Filed: December 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS IN AMOUNT OF $5,218.00 AGAINST JONES AND DENYING REQUEST TO BAR FUTURE REMOVALS 10 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: cc: order, docket and remand letter to Los Angeles Superior Court, West District, Santa Monica, No. 12U01031. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc). Modified on 4/7/2015 (lc).
March 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER COMPELLING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT FURTHER EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF RECOVERY OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: U.S. Bank to submit a detailed accounting of U.S.Banks attorneys fees and costs incurred in filing its Motion to Rem and. If U.S. Bank fails to provide the requested evidence by Wednesday, April 1, 2015, the Court will deny Plaintiffs recovery of attorneys fees and costs in the Courts forthcoming order ruling on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. (lc). Modified on 3/25/2015. (lc).
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Hearing on MOTION to RemandCase 10 , scheduled for March 9, 2015 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. (lc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Stacia Trimmer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Occupants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darryl Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stacia Trimmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Yelena Cayton
Represented By: Jonathan Douglas Fink
Represented By: T Robert Finlay
Represented By: Shalom Rubanowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?