Star Fabrics Inc v. CSI Industries Inc et al
Star Fabrics Inc and (PC) Mehmood |
CSI Industries Inc, Andris, Does 1 through 10 and Alight |
2:2015cv00043 |
January 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
George H Wu |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) Mailed copies to the Register of Copyrights. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal) (gk) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Star Fabrics Inc. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 14 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to CSI Industries Inc answer now due 3/9/2015, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant CSI Industries Inc.(Moser, Christina) |
Filing 13 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07 and General Order 14-03. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV15-00043 GW (JEMx). (mg) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to CSI Industries Inc answer now due 2/20/2015, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant CSI Industries Inc.(Attorney Christina J Moser added to party CSI Industries Inc(pty:dft))(Moser, Christina) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Star Fabrics Inc, upon Defendant CSI Industries Inc served on 1/9/2015, answer due 1/30/2015. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Harinder Takhar- President in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Star Fabrics Inc, upon Defendant Alight served on 1/9/2015, answer due 1/30/2015. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Norman Weiss- President in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge George H. Wu Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials. (pg) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Alight, CSI Industries Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. (ghap) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Star Fabrics Inc. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Star Fabrics Inc. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Star Fabrics Inc, (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Star Fabrics Inc. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-14999213 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Star Fabrics Inc. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Star Fabrics Inc(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.