Robert Jaffee et al v. Rudolph Carryl et al
| Barbara Jaffee and Robert Jaffee |
| Rudolph Carryl, Carryl Capital Management, LLC and Does |
| 2:2015cv00113 |
| January 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT 86 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court DENIES AS MOOT and without prejudice Defendant Aus Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 86.) Defendant Au may refile his motion as appropriate in response to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (vv)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Based on Plaintiffs Status report (ECF No. 62), the Court hereby CONTINUES the date by which Plaintiffs must show cause as to why Defendants have not been served with the First Amended Complaint to May 31, 2016. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this order upon the filing of a proof of service of summons as to each defendant named in this action. (lc)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Based on Plaintiffs Status report (ECF No. 32), the Court hereby CONTINUES the date by which Plaintiffs must show cause as to why Defendants have not been served with the First Amended Complaint to April 8, 2016. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this order upon the filing of a proof of serviceof summons as to each defendant named in this action. (vv)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Based on Plaintiffs Status report 24 , the Court hereby CONTINUES the date by which Plaintiffs must show cause as to why Defendants have not been served with the First Amended Complaint to March 8, 2016. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this order upon the filing of a proof of service of summons as to each defendant named in this action. (lc)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 17 AND SETTING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs shall file their First Amended Complaint as a stand-alone document within fourteen days of this Order.The Court also ord ers Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, no later than February 8, 2016, why Defendants have not been served with the First Amended Complaint. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this order upon the filing of a proof of service of summons as to each defendant named in this action. (lc). Modified on 1/6/2016 (lc).
|
|
Filing
11
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing no later than March 23, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
