Harold Vincent Franklin v. Connie Gipson

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Harold Vincent Franklin v. Connie Gipson

Harold Vincent Franklin v. Connie Gipson

Petitioner:	Harold Vincent Franklin
Respondent:	Connie Gipson
Case Number:	2:2015cv00388
Filed:	January 20, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge:	Manuel L. Real
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 26, 2015	Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FOLLOW COURT ORDERS by Judge Manuel L. Real. See Order for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
January 26, 2015	Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF SUCCESSIVE PETITION by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Accordingly, petitioner is ordered to show cause why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as successive. Specifically, no later than February 16, 2015, petitioner must submit to the Court documentation showing that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), he properly filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive petition, and that the Ninth Circuit issued such an order. See attached Order for details. (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 26, 2015

Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FOLLOW COURT ORDERS by Judge Manuel L. Real. *See Order for details.* Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

January 26, 2015

Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF SUCCESSIVE PETITION by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Accordingly, petitioner is ordered to show cause why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as successive. Specifically, no later than February 16, 2015, petitioner must submit to the Court documentation showing that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), he properly filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive petition, and that the Ninth Circuit issued such an order. *See attached Order for details.* (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harold Vincent Franklin v. Connie Gipson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Harold Vincent Franklin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Connie Gipson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?