Kathleen Mulligan v. Jenny Yang
Kathleen Mulligan |
Jenny Yang |
2:2015cv00712 |
January 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Margaret A. Nagle |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RETAX COSTS 69 , 70 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc). Modified on 3/2/2017 (lc). |
Filing 59 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 41 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc). Modified on 11/3/2016. (lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kathleen Mulligan v. Jenny Yang | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kathleen Mulligan | |
Represented By: | Andria Catalano Redcrow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jenny Yang | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.