Kathleen Mulligan v. Jenny Yang
Plaintiff: Kathleen Mulligan
Defendant: Jenny Yang
Case Number: 2:2015cv00712
Filed: January 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Margaret A. Nagle
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RETAX COSTS 69 , 70 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc). Modified on 3/2/2017 (lc).
November 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 41 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc). Modified on 11/3/2016. (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kathleen Mulligan v. Jenny Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Mulligan
Represented By: Andria Catalano Redcrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jenny Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?