Jorge A Mejia v. DHL Express (USA) Inc et al.
| Jorge Alberto Mejia |
| DHL Express (USA) Inc and Does |
| 2:2015cv00890 |
| February 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| George H. King |
| Labor: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 30 . See order for details. (hr)
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER re: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Dkt. 20) by Judge George H. King denying 20 Motion to Remand Case to State Court: The estimated sum of these three claims is $9,425,514, far more than the $5,000,000 required for CAFA jurisdiction. Accordingly, we have subject matter jurisdiction, and Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge George H. King taking under submission 20 Motion to Remand Case to State Court: On the court's own motion, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to State Court 20 , noticed for hearing on APRIL 20, 2015, is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR and will be taken UNDER SUBMISSION without oral argument on that date pursuant to Local Rule 7-15. No appearance by counsel shall be necessary. The hearing date is vacated. Further briefing, if any, shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules as if the noticed hearing date had not been vacated. (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
