Inversiones San Miguel 2053 v. Bracho Vazquez et al
Plaintiff: Inversiones San Miguel 2053
Defendant: Jesus Alfonso Bracho Vazquez and Maria Luzbany Rodas Rodas
Case Number: 2:2015cv00990
Filed: February 11, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Inversiones San Miguel 2053 v. Bracho Vazquez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesus Alfonso Bracho Vazquez
Represented By: Todd Anthony Nesbitt
Represented By: Paul B Nesbitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maria Luzbany Rodas Rodas
Represented By: Todd Anthony Nesbitt
Represented By: Paul B Nesbitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Inversiones San Miguel 2053
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?