Jeremy Valentin v. M Frink
Petitioner: Jeremy Valentin
Respondent: M. Frink
Case Number: 2:2015cv01049
Filed: February 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Guilford
Presiding Judge: Ralph Zarefsky
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the First Amended Petition is dismissed without prejudice. Related to: Order 45 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Andrew J. Guilford for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 4 (ib)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeremy Valentin v. M Frink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Frink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeremy Valentin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?