Shawn Thomas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Shawn Thomas |
| Does and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 2:2015cv01066 |
| February 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order remanding action to state court by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. On February 13, 2015, Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("Defendant") filed a Notice of Filing of Removal of Civil Ac tion to United States District Court 2 . Defendant also filed a document with the identical title on that same day 5 . The first Notice indicates that service was made on Plaintiff via United States mail Dkt. 2 2. The second Notice merely st ates that Defendant filed a notice of removal with this Court 5 . None of Defendant's documents provide this Court with the basis upon which removal is sought. Accordingly, the Court has no way of assessing whether jurisdiction is proper. For the foregoing reasons, the Court REMANDS this action to state court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case to Los Angeles Superior Court at Chatsworth Courthouse, Case number PC056137 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lom) Modified on 2/24/2015 (lom). (mailed 2/24/15)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
