Anthony Deleon Jackson v. Clark Ducart
Anthony Deleon Jackson |
Clark Ducart |
2:2015cv01176 |
February 18, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L. Abrams |
Beverly Reid O'Connell |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND OPINION by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment is entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is also denied. **See Order for details.** (ch) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Anthony Deleon Jackson v. Clark Ducart | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Clark Ducart | |
Represented By: | Toni R Johns Estaville |
Represented By: | Michael Robert Johnsen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Anthony Deleon Jackson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.