Jeannette Martello v. Shelley Rouillard et al
| Jeannette Martello |
| Does, Kimberly Kirchmeyer and Shelley Rouillard |
| 2:2015cv01798 |
| March 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's 7/6/2015 Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 47 , 50 . Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS Defendant Kimberly Kirchmeyer's Motion to Dismiss 21 and Defendant Shelley Rouillard's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 24 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Because Plaintiff has not provided the Court with adequate proof of service, Plaintiff's Request for Leave to Exceed Page Limit for Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion for a Tempor ary Restraining Order 10 and her request for judicial notice are DENIED. Further, plaintiff is admonished to follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of court. Failure to do so may result in monetary or other sanctions, including but not limited to terminating sanctions. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
