Phillips 66 Company vs. T.M. B. Enterprises Inc et al
Phillips 66 Company |
Suzanne Helo, Thomas Helo and T.M.B. Enterprises, Inc. |
2:2015cv01962 |
March 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P. Rosenbluth |
George H. Wu |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST GUARANTOR THOMAS HELO by Judge George H. Wu, 105 Phillips 66 Company is owed the amount of $285,025.89 by Thomas Helo; 2. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to prejudgment interest against Thomas Helo at the rate of 036;47.95 per day from March 28, 2012 to May 3, 2016, in the amount of $71,779.28; 3. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to additional prejudgment interest against Thomas Helo at the rate of $47.95 per day from May 4, 2016 to the day befor e the date of this judgment; 4. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to post-judgment interest against Thomas Helo from the date of this judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1961; 5. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to reasonable attorneys fe es against Thomas Helo in the amount of $168,401.95 and litigation expenses against Thomas Helo in the amount of $1,178.65; and 6. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to costs of court. 7. Phillips 66 is entitled to all writs and process necessary to enforce andcollect this judgment. 8. This judgment finally disposes of all remaining parties and all remaining claims, and is appealable. (pj) |
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner, DENYING Plaintiff's request for remand, and DISMISSING this action with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on counsel for both parties. (See Order for details) (bem) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.