Gordon Bullock v. S Johnson et al
| Gordon Bullock |
| CO B Conley, DOE, Gomez, Lt S Johnson, CO Z Marks, CO Valyza Moreno, Simon, Trina Tayor, Elvin Valenzuela and Lt David Young |
| 2:2015cv02070 |
| March 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Alka Sagar |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Percy Anderson for Motion for Summary Judgment 62 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to entire case 52 , Report and Recommendation (Issued) 65 . IT IS ORDERED t hat (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; (2) Defendant Johnson's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and (3) Plaintiff's claims against Defendant T. Brekke are DISMISSED without prejudice. (see order for details) (hr)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 32 by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Johnson's motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant J ohnson is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant Johnsons motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim is DENIED. Defendant Johnson is ordered to file an Answer with respect to this claim no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
