Metal Jeans, Inc. v. State Of California et al
| Metal Jeans, Inc. |
| Todd Barrett, Does, Howard Sommers Towing, Inc., Jon Relles and State of California |
| Jennifer K Villebro |
| 2:2015cv02127 |
| March 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CHP OFFICER JON RELLES, CHP OFFICER TODD BARRETT AND HOWARD SOMMERS TOWING, INC. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiff Metal Jeans, Inc. take nothing in this action, that the action by plaintiff M etal Jeans, Inc. against defendants State of California, acting by and through the CHP, CHP Officer Jon Relles, CHP Officer Todd Barrett and Howard Sommers Towing, Inc. be dismissed on the merits, and that defendants State of California, acting by and through the CHP, CHP Officer Jon Relles, CHP Officer Todd Barrett and Howard Sommers Towing, Inc. recover their costs. (lc)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: granting 54 55 for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED with respect to all claims. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lom)
|
|
Filing
45
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh re Stipulation for Protective Order 44 . See Order for complete details. (dml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
