Gerald Delane Beckwith v. R J Rackley
Petitioner: Gerald Delane Beckwith
Respondent: R J Rackley
Case Number: 2:2015cv02305
Filed: March 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Related to: Report and Recommendation (Issued) 36 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 46 51 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition 1 27 in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gerald Delane Beckwith v. R J Rackley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gerald Delane Beckwith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R J Rackley
Represented By: Kenneth C Byrne
Represented By: Ana R Duarte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?