R Mora et al v US Bank et al
| L Mora and R Mora |
| Does and US Bank |
| 2:2015cv02436 |
| April 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Truth in Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Courts order granted Plaintiffs ROBERT MORA and LILLIAN MORA up to and including November 16, 2015 to file a second amended complaint. Id. Plaintiffs did not file a second amendedcomplaint. IT IS THEREFORE OR DERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that thisaction is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action in this action, and that Plaintiffs take nothing by way of their claims.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 43 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs have leave to amend the HBOR claim under 2924.11(d) and any UCL claim as it relates to a violation of HBOR, as detailed above. The Second Amended Complaint shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND LEAVE TO AMEND 14 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. However, the claim under § 2923.7 is dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Additionally, Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend the complaint solely as to the disparate impact claim under ECOA and any related claim under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200. Any amended complaint shall be filed not later than 21 days after the date of this order. (lom)
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED that on the Court's own motion the MOTION TO DISMISS 14 set for July 20, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., is hereby taken off calendar, the hearing date vacated and will be decided without oral argument. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
