William V.R. Smith v. Sprint Corporation et al
| William V R Smith |
| Does and Sprint Corporation |
| 2:2015cv02485 |
| April 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Alka Sagar |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: In light of the Notice of Settlement filed October 6, 2015, the Court sets a hearing on Order To Show Cause Re Dismissal for November 9, 2015 at 11:30 a.m. If a stipulated dismissal is filed prior to this date, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance is needed. All other dates are hereby vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. (cw)
|
|
Filing
43
MINUTES (In Chambers) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 37 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: The Court DENIES the Motion. Defendants shall file an Answer to the FAC within 14 days of the filing of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jp)
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald RE: Motion to Dismiss Case 37 . The Courtroom Deputy Clerk distributes the Court's tentative ruling prior to the case being called. Case called, and counsel make their appearance. The Court hears oral argument from counsel and takes the matter under submission. An order will issue. Court Reporter: Rosalyn Adams. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
