Dolores Press, Inc. v. Patrick Robinson et al
| Dolores Press, Inc. |
| Docs Dream LLC, Does, Patrick Robinson and Truth Seekers, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv02562 |
| April 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
235
AMENDED JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction, 229 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT 1. Plaintiffs Dolores Press and Melissa Scott's ("Plaintiffs") claims against defendants Michael Evans and Tina Pereida are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the Court's January 30, 2020 Minute Order; (see document for details). (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
59
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real: On 6/23/2015, this Court granted the Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants Patrick Robinson, Truth Seekers, Inc., and Doc's Dream, LLC. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Complaint is dismissed. Judgement is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. (gk)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED 15 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
