Marvin Williams v. J. Katavich

Marvin Williams v. J. Katavich

Petitioner:	Marvin Williams
Respondent:	J. Katavich
Case Number:	2:2015cv02600
Filed:	April 8, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge:	George H. Wu
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 6, 2015	Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice as successive. In light of this dismissal, petitioners request for appointment of counsel is denied. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
April 10, 2015	Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE AND/OR AS BARRED BY THE EXPIRATION OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Based on the foregoing, petitioner is ordered to show cause (1) why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as successive; and (2) why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as time barred. Specifically, no later than May 1, 2015, petitioner must submit to the Court the following: (1) documentation showing that, pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) (3)(A), he properly filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive petition, and that the Ninth Circuit issued such an order; and (2) a response making clear his arguments, if any, as to why the Petition should not be dismissed as time barred. All facts relied upon by petitioner must be proved by testimony contained in a declaration signed under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, or in properly authenticated documents. See Order for details. (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 6, 2015

Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice as successive. In light of this dismissal, petitioners request for appointment of counsel is denied. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

April 10, 2015

Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE AND/OR AS BARRED BY THE EXPIRATION OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Based on the foregoing, petitioner is ordered to show cause (1) why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as successive; and (2) why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as time barred. Specifically, no later than May 1, 2015, petitioner must submit to the Court the following: (1) documentation showing that, pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) (3)(A), he properly filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive petition, and that the Ninth Circuit issued such an order; and (2) a response making clear his arguments, if any, as to why the Petition should not be dismissed as time barred. All facts relied upon by petitioner must be proved by testimony contained in a declaration signed under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, or in properly authenticated documents. *See Order for details.* (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marvin Williams v. J. Katavich
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: J. Katavich
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Marvin Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?