Eyon Neal Christmas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Eyon Neal Christmas |
George R Davis, Does, Kenneth R Fair, Zachary J Pittman, Union Pacific Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company and John E Yettaw |
2:2015cv02612 |
April 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L. Abrams |
Andre Birotte |
Labor: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment on the merits is hereby entered in favor of Defendant on all counts, that Plaintiff Eyon Neal Christmas shall take nothing by this action, and that Plainti ff's First Amended Complaint shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set forth in this Court's 11/19/2015, Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 50 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
Filing 33 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: The Court DENIES Plaintiff Eyon Neal Christmas's Motion to Remand 15 , and with removal being deemed proper, Mr. Christmas is not entitled to Attorney's Fees. And because Mr. Christmas 9;s California Labor Code Section 604 claim is not preempted under the FRSA, Defendants Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Corporation's Motion to Dismiss 10 is DENIED. The stay on this matter is now lifted. The Court resets the scheduling conference for 11/16/2015 at 10:00 AM. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.