Travis Charles Brown v. City of Long Beach et al
Travis Charles Brown |
Police Officer Bernard Barajas, POA Attorney Jim Brott, City of Long Beach, County of Los Angeles, Homicide Lt. L. Cox, Homicide Sargent E. Herzog, Long Beach Police Department, Peer Officer R. Solorio, Lorenzo Uribe, Peer Officer H. Vong and Commander Homicide D. Wood |
2:2015cv02613 |
April 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Victor B. Kenton |
R. Gary Klausner |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Re Order Accepting Report and Recommendations 17 , (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ib) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton re: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. The First Amended Complaint should bear the docket number assigned in this case, be labeled First Amend ed Complaint and be complete in and of itself without reference to the original Complaint or any other pleading, attachment or document. Plaintiff may not add new Defendants. Plaintiff is admonished that if he fails to timely file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed with prejudice on the grounds set forth above for failure to diligently prosecute. (rh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.