Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Scott Victor Fellwock et al
| Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust |
| Scott Victor Fellwock and Doris Kathaleen Williams |
| 2:2015cv02759 |
| April 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust against Doris Kathaleen Williams, Scott Victor Fellwock After full consideration of Plaintiff's motion for default judgment and discharge of s takeholder and for attorneys' fees and costs, and the authorities submitted by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: (1) The complaint for interpleader, filed by the Trustees in this action, is proper and the complaint stat ed an adequate case in interpleader. (2) The plaintiff's motion for default judgment and for discharge of stakeholder and for attorneys' fees and costs is GRANTED. Default Judgment is entered against Scott Victor Fellwock ("Scott"). The Trustees are awarded $11,620.00 for attorneys' fees and $1,195.15 for costs which shall be deducted from the benefits payable from the Trust pursuant to this judgment. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
