Melody L. Cochran v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company NA et al
| Melody L Cochran |
| Does, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company NA and Western Progressive LLC |
| 2:2015cv03209 |
| April 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| George H. King |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King, in favor of Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company NA, Western Progressive LLC against Melody L Cochran: Pursuant to the Court's July 29, 2015 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing by this Complaint. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge George H. King taking under submission 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case: On the Court's own motion, the motion to dismiss [document #9], noticed for hearing on July 27, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., is TAKEN OFF CALENDA R and will be taken UNDER SUBMISSION without oral argument on that date pursuant to Local Rule 7-15. No appearance by counsel shall be necessary. The hearing date is vacated. Further briefing, if any, shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules as if the noticed hearing date had not been vacated. (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
