Aaron Thad Payne v. Elvin Valenzuela
Petitioner: Aaron Thad Payne
Respondent: Elvin Valenzuela
Case Number: 2:2015cv03243
Filed: April 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Victor B. Kenton
Presiding Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: The Petition is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Amending Judgment 37 . (ib)
January 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: The Petition is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice. Re Order Accepting Report and Recommendations 36 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ib)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aaron Thad Payne v. Elvin Valenzuela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Aaron Thad Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Elvin Valenzuela
Represented By: Toni R Johns Estaville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?