MTI Capital Inc v. Peter Raymond Moreno et al.
MTI Capital Inc |
All Occupants of 1320 North Ontare Road Santa Barbara California 93105, Does and Peter Raymond Moreno |
2:2015cv03333 |
May 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Patrick J. Walsh |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: Defendant has impermissibly attempted to remove this action three times on the same grounds. Such successive removals are improper and unjustified. Defendant has failed to meet his burden of showing an adequate basis for this Court's jurisdiction over this action. Accordingly, because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, this action is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara, Case No. 15CV00168. DEFENDANT PETER RAYMOND MORENO IS ORDERED NOT TO FILE ANOTHER NOTICE OF REMOVAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THAT SEEKS TO REMOVE CASE NO. 15CV00168 FROM THE SANTA BARBARA SUPERIOR COURT. ANY F URTHER ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THIS UNLAWFUL DETAINER ACTION TO THIS COURT WILL RESULT IN AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT. IF FOUND IN CONTEMPT, THE PENALTIES COULD INCLUDE MONETARY SANCTIONS, INCLUDING THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE PLAINTIFF, AND/OR IMPRISONMENT. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.