Federal Trade Commission v. Lunada Biomedical, Inc. et al
| Federal Trade Commission |
| Emil Arutyunov, Donna Kasseinova, Lunada Biomedical, Inc. and Roman Trunin |
| 2:2015cv03380 |
| May 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
STIPULATED ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MONETARY JUDGMENT AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS 98 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants, Defendants officers, agents, employees, and all other persons in active concert or participatio n with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any Covered Product, are hereby pe rmanently restrained and enjoined. Judgment in the amount of $40,000,000 isentered in favor of the Commission against Lunada Biomedical, Inc., Donna Kasseinova, Roman Trunin, and Emil Arutyunov, aka Emil Chiaberi, jointly and severally, as equit able monetary relief. Defendants are ordered to pay to the Commission $250,000. FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
