Antiaging Institute of California, Inc. v. Solonova, LLC et al
| Antiaging Institute of California, Inc. |
| Deppak Chopra, Does, Easy Living Health and Solonova, LLC |
| 2:2015cv03416 |
| May 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
226
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Plaintiff hereby abandons its applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") seeking to trademark "LiquiCalcium" (Serial No. 86507597), and "LiquiCalcium 6 Plus" (Serial No. 86513049). Plaintiff and its officers, agents, directors, and employees, or affiliates, whether acting directly or indirectly, are hereby permanently enjoined from any use of the marks "LiquiCalcium," "LiquiCa lcium 6 Plus," "LIQUI-CALCIUM" or any mark that is substantially similar to the Marks. Plaintiff hereby dismisses, with prejudice, all claims against Defendants, their employees, directors, officers, agents, or successors and assigns, contained in the First Amended Complaint. Tishcon hereby dismisses all claims against Plaintiff, their employees, directors, officers, agents, or successors and assigns, contained in Tishcon's counterclaims contained in the answer to the FAC. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
|
Filing
154
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (mz)
|
|
Filing
133
(IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962 ) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause , in writing, on or before June 2, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (clee)
|
|
Filing
124
(IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before April 21, 2016, why this action should not be dismisse d for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
|
Filing
106
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before March 8, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
