Josefina Galindo v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc et al
| Josefina Galindo |
| Does, Randall Naiman, National Default Servicing Corp., Select Portfolio Servicing Inc and U.S. Bank N.A. |
| 2:2015cv03582 |
| May 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff Josefina Galindo's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's 2/8/2017 Judgment 68 is DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
56
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 50 is hereby DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
49
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendants Select Portfolio Services, Inc. ("SPS"), National Default Servicing Corp. ("NDS"), and U.S. Bank, N.A., Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association, on b ehalf of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE7, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-HE7's ("Trustee") motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) 37 ; and defenda nt-attorney Randall Naiman's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) 39 . Plaintiff's FAC is hereby DISMISSED. Specifically, all of plaintiff's claims against def endant-attorney Randall Naiman are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's claims against defendants SPS, NDS, and Trustee for violations of the FDCPA and the Rosenthal Act, as well as her claim in equity for quiet title and/or to set aside the trustee's sale for wrongful foreclosure, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to SPS, NDS, and Trustee. All of plaintiff's additional claims asserted in the FAC as to all defendants are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, as plaintiff did not have leave of Court or consent of the parties to file an amended complaint asserting these additional claims or adding additional defendants not named in the original complaint. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
