The Bank of New York Mellon v. Henry Nelson Hobdy
Plaintiff: The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant: Henry Nelson Hobdy
Case Number: 2:2015cv03743
Filed: May 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W. Fitzgerald
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, Case Number 14U15582, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Bank of New York Mellon v. Henry Nelson Hobdy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Henry Nelson Hobdy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Bank of New York Mellon
Represented By: Randall D Naiman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?