Chernoby Russell v. W. L. Montgomory
Petitioner: Chernoby Russell
Respondent: W. L. Montgomory
Case Number: 2:2015cv04158
Filed: June 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge 34 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied, Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chernoby Russell v. W. L. Montgomory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Montgomory
Represented By: Kimberley Baker-Guillemet
Represented By: Scott A Taryle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chernoby Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?