Mike Jones v. Guy Marsala et al
| Mike Jones |
| Bruce Bedrick, Matthew Feinstein, Thomas Iwanski, Jennifer S. Love, J. Mitchell Lowe, Guy Marsala, Medbox, Inc., Pejman Vincent Mehdizadeh, C. Douglas Mitchell and Ned Siegel |
| 2:2015cv04170 |
| June 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Stockholders Suits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. The Court hereby approves the Fee and Expense Amount consisting of $297,241.41 in cash and the transfer of 2,000,000 shares of Medbox common stock from defendant Mehdizadeh to Pla intiffs' counsel and 300,000 shares of common stock from defendant Bedrick to Plaintiffs' Counsel and directs payment of the Fee and Expense Amount in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation. The Court hereby approves the Service Awar d of $1,500 for each of the Plaintiffs, to be paid from Plaintiffs' Counsels' Fee and Expense Amount in recognition of Plaintiffs' participation and effort in the prosecution of the Actions. Related to: Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment 84 . See attached document for details.) (lom)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. re Stipulation for Protective Order 34 . (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
