Mark Stoyas v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Mark Stoyas |
Norio Sasaki, Hisao Tanaka and Toshiba Corporation |
2:2015cv04194 |
June 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Securities/Commodities |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 232 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION 220 TO EXCLUDE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiffs' Motion to exclude is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more information. (shb) |
Filing 148 AMENDED ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, 108 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification regarding the Exchange Act claims. The court further DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification regarding the JFIEA claims, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more information. (shb) |
Filing 146 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, 108 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification regarding the Exchange Act claims. The court further DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification regarding the JFIEA claims, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more information. (shb) |
Filing 145 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE, 131 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court will disregard all references to Dr. Cains Second Reply Report in Plaintiffs Reply brief in support of its Motion for Class Certification. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb) |
Filing 119 ORDER GRANTING MINISTRY OF ECONOMY, TRADE AND INDUSTRY OF JAPANS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PARTICIPATE AS AMICUS CURIAE, 111 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: CONCLUSION: It is ORDERED that the motion of METI for leave to participate as an amicus curiae is GRANTED. The court further orders METI to comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 29 in the filing of the amicus brief. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more information. (shb) |
Filing 102 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [CORRECTION MADE TO CROSS-REFERENCE IN PARAGRAPH 1] 101 by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian (es) |
Filing 67 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, and that FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs. (lc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.